SQL Server 2022 UTF-8 Support Enhancements in Collation

In SQL Server 2022, UTF-8 support has been enhanced, offering more efficient storage and better performance for text data. This blog will explore these enhancements using the JBDB database and provide a detailed business use case to illustrate the benefits of adopting UTF-8 collation.

🌍Business Use Case: International E-commerce Platform 🌍

Imagine an international e-commerce platform that serves customers worldwide, offering products in multiple languages. The database needs to handle diverse character sets efficiently, from English to Japanese, Arabic, and more. Previously, using Unicode (UTF-16) required more storage space, leading to increased costs and slower performance. With SQL Server 2022’s improved UTF-8 support, the platform can now store multilingual text data more compactly, reducing storage costs and enhancing query performance.

UTF-8 Support in SQL Server 2022

SQL Server 2019 introduced UTF-8 as a new encoding option, allowing for more efficient storage of character data. SQL Server 2022 builds on this foundation by enhancing collation support, making it easier to work with UTF-8 encoded data. Let’s explore these enhancements using the JBDB database.

Setting Up the JBDB Database

First, we’ll set up the JBDB database and create a table to store product information in multiple languages.

CREATE DATABASE JBDB;
GO

USE JBDB;
GO

CREATE TABLE Products (
    ProductID INT PRIMARY KEY,
    ProductName NVARCHAR(100),
    ProductDescription NVARCHAR(1000),
    ProductDescription_UTF8 VARCHAR(1000) COLLATE Latin1_General_100_BIN2_UTF8
);
GO

In this example, ProductDescription uses the traditional NVARCHAR data type with UTF-16 encoding, while ProductDescription_UTF8 uses VARCHAR with the Latin1_General_100_BIN2_UTF8 collation for UTF-8 encoding.

Inserting Data with UTF-8 Collation 🚀

Let’s insert some sample data into the Products table, showcasing different languages.

INSERT INTO Products (ProductID, ProductName, ProductDescription, ProductDescription_UTF8)
VALUES
(1, 'Laptop', N'高性能ノートパソコン', '高性能ノートパソコン'), -- Japanese
(2, 'Smartphone', N'الهاتف الذكي الأكثر تقدمًا', 'الهاتف الذكي الأكثر تقدمًا'), -- Arabic
(3, 'Tablet', N'Nueva tableta con características avanzadas', 'Nueva tableta con características avanzadas'); -- Spanish
GO

Here, we use N'...' to denote Unicode literals for the NVARCHAR column and regular string literals for the VARCHAR column with UTF-8 encoding.

Querying and Comparing Storage Size 📊

To see the benefits of UTF-8 encoding, we’ll compare the storage size of the ProductDescription and ProductDescription_UTF8 columns.

SELECT
    ProductID,
    DATALENGTH(ProductDescription) AS UnicodeStorage,
    DATALENGTH(ProductDescription_UTF8) AS UTF8Storage
FROM Products;
GO

This query returns the number of bytes used to store each product description, illustrating the storage savings with UTF-8.

Working with UTF-8 Data 🔍

Let’s perform some queries and operations on the UTF-8 encoded data.

Searching for Products in Japanese:

SELECT ProductID, ProductName, ProductDescription_UTF8
FROM Products
WHERE ProductDescription_UTF8 LIKE '%ノートパソコン%';
GO

Updating UTF-8 Data:

UPDATE Products
SET ProductDescription_UTF8 = '高性能なノートパソコン'
WHERE ProductID = 1;
GO

Ordering Data with UTF-8 Collation:

SELECT ProductID, ProductName, ProductDescription_UTF8
FROM Products
ORDER BY ProductDescription_UTF8 COLLATE Latin1_General_100_BIN2_UTF8;
GO

Advantages of UTF-8 in SQL Server 2022 🏆

  1. Reduced Storage Costs: UTF-8 encoding is more space-efficient than UTF-16, especially for languages using the Latin alphabet.
  2. Improved Performance: Smaller data size leads to faster reads and writes, enhancing overall performance.
  3. Enhanced Compatibility: UTF-8 is a widely-used encoding standard, making it easier to integrate with other systems and technologies.

Conclusion ✨

SQL Server 2022’s enhanced UTF-8 support in collation offers significant advantages for businesses dealing with multilingual data. By leveraging these enhancements, the international e-commerce platform in our use case can optimize storage, improve performance, and provide a seamless user experience across diverse languages.

Whether you’re dealing with global customer data or localized content, adopting UTF-8 collation in SQL Server 2022 can be a game-changer for your database management strategy.

For more tutorials and tips on SQL Server, including performance tuning and database management, be sure to check out our JBSWiki YouTube channel.

Thank You,
Vivek Janakiraman

Disclaimer:
The views expressed on this blog are mine alone and do not reflect the views of my company or anyone else. All postings on this blog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.

SQL Server Unused Indexes: Identification, Monitoring, and Management

Indexes are crucial for optimizing query performance in SQL Server. However, not all indexes are used effectively; some might remain unused, consuming space and resources unnecessarily. In this comprehensive blog, we’ll delve into the concept of unused indexes, how to identify them, the potential risks of deleting them, and best practices for managing them. We’ll also explore real-world scenarios and provide the necessary T-SQL scripts for monitoring and handling unused indexes.


🔍 What is an Unused Index?

An unused index is an index that exists in the database but is not used by the SQL Server query optimizer. This could be due to several reasons:

  1. Outdated Query Patterns: The index may have been useful for queries that are no longer executed.
  2. Changes in Data Distribution: Alterations in data patterns may render the index less effective or redundant.
  3. Incorrect Index Design: The index might not align with the current workload or data structure.

Unused indexes can lead to unnecessary resource consumption, such as additional storage space and increased overhead during data modification operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE).

Risks of Removing Unused Indexes ⚠️

While removing unused indexes can free up resources, it can also lead to unexpected performance issues if not done carefully. Here are some potential risks:

  1. Impact on Rarely Used Queries: An index might appear unused but could be critical for infrequent queries, such as quarterly reports.
  2. Incorrect Monitoring Period: A short monitoring period might not capture all usage patterns, leading to incorrect conclusions.

Best Practices for Monitoring Unused Indexes 📊

  1. Extended Monitoring Period: Monitor index usage over an extended period (e.g., several months) to capture all usage patterns.
  2. Analyze Workload Patterns: Understand your workload and identify critical periods (e.g., end-of-month processing).
  3. Test Before Removing: Always test the impact of removing an index in a non-production environment.

Advantages of Managing Unused Indexes 🌟

  1. Improved Performance: Reducing the number of unused indexes can improve performance for data modification operations.
  2. Reduced Storage Costs: Freeing up storage space by removing unused indexes.
  3. Simplified Maintenance: Fewer indexes to maintain and monitor.

🔧 How to Identify Unused Indexes

Identifying unused indexes involves monitoring the usage statistics provided by SQL Server. The sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats dynamic management view (DMV) is a valuable resource for this purpose.

📋 T-SQL Script to Identify Unused Indexes

The following script retrieves information about indexes that haven’t been used since the last server restart:

SELECT 
    i.name AS IndexName,
    i.object_id,
    o.name AS TableName,
    s.name AS SchemaName,
    i.index_id,
    u.user_seeks,
    u.user_scans,
    u.user_lookups,
    u.user_updates
FROM 
    sys.indexes AS i
JOIN 
    sys.objects AS o ON i.object_id = o.object_id
JOIN 
    sys.schemas AS s ON o.schema_id = s.schema_id
LEFT JOIN 
    sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats AS u 
    ON i.object_id = u.object_id AND i.index_id = u.index_id
WHERE 
    i.is_primary_key = 0
    AND i.is_unique_constraint = 0
    AND o.type = 'U'
    AND u.index_id IS NULL
    AND u.object_id IS NULL
ORDER BY 
    s.name, o.name, i.name;

This script filters out primary key and unique constraint indexes, focusing on user-created indexes that have not been used since the last server restart.


⚠️ Potential Issues with Deleting Unused Indexes

While removing unused indexes can free up resources, it also carries potential risks:

  1. Hidden Usage: Some indexes may not show usage in the DMV statistics if they are used infrequently or during specific maintenance operations.
  2. Future Requirements: An index deemed unused might be needed for future queries or batch jobs, especially if they run infrequently (e.g., quarterly reports).
  3. Inaccurate Assessment: Short monitoring periods can lead to incorrect conclusions about an index’s utility.

⏲️ Best Time Frame for Monitoring

It’s advisable to monitor index usage over a prolonged period, ideally encompassing a full business cycle (e.g., monthly, quarterly). This ensures that all potential usage patterns, including infrequent but critical operations, are accounted for.


🛠️ Handling Unused Indexes

Best Practices for Managing Unused Indexes

  1. Prolonged Monitoring: As mentioned, extend the monitoring period to capture all usage patterns.
  2. Review Before Deletion: Before removing an index, consult with application developers and database administrators to understand its purpose.
  3. Testing and Staging: Always test the impact of removing an index in a staging environment before applying changes to production.
  4. Documentation: Maintain documentation of all indexes and their intended purpose to avoid unintentional removal.

📜 Example Scenarios

1. Beneficial Removal of an Unused Index

Scenario: A retail company finds an unused index on a transactional table that has not been utilized for over a year. The index occupies significant disk space and slows down data modification operations.

Action: After thorough analysis and consultation, the company decides to remove the index, resulting in improved performance and reduced storage costs.

T-SQL for Removing the Index:

DROP INDEX IndexName ON SchemaName.TableName;

2. Problematic Removal of a Used Index

Scenario: A financial services company removes an index that appears unused based on a short monitoring period. The index was actually used for a quarterly reconciliation job, leading to significantly slower performance and extended processing times during the next quarter.

Lesson Learned: The company learned the importance of comprehensive monitoring and consultation before making changes.


🏢 Business Use Cases

Cost Optimization

Removing unused indexes can free up valuable disk space and reduce maintenance overhead, leading to cost savings. This is particularly beneficial for organizations with large databases where storage costs are a significant concern.

Performance Enhancement

By eliminating unnecessary indexes, the performance of data modification operations can be improved, leading to faster transaction processing and more efficient database operations.


🏁 Conclusion

Managing unused indexes in SQL Server requires careful analysis and a comprehensive approach. While removing unused indexes can provide benefits like reduced storage costs and improved performance, it is crucial to ensure that the indexes are genuinely unused and not required for infrequent operations. By following best practices and leveraging the right tools, you can optimize your SQL Server environment effectively.

For any questions or further guidance, feel free to reach out or leave a comment! Happy optimizing! 🚀

For more tutorials and tips on SQL Server, including performance tuning and database management, be sure to check out our JBSWiki YouTube channel.

Thank You,
Vivek Janakiraman

Disclaimer:
The views expressed on this blog are mine alone and do not reflect the views of my company or anyone else. All postings on this blog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.